Secretary

Do you need one?

Under the Unit Titles Act every Body Corporate must have a secretary. Apart from some smaller Body Corporates, which manage their own secretarial function, this function is usually carried out by a professional secretary. The initial secretary is appointed by the developer of the complex. Whether for performance reasons, costs or personality conflicts, a Body Corporate may look to change its secretary at any time. Sadly a number of secretaries resist such change in a fashion out of proportion to logic and sound business practice – this may include relying on unlawful rules to attempt to retain the Body Corporate or intimidate owners. Boutique is able to assist in effecting change, cost effectively, in the interest of all owners.

How Do You Change?

Owners should not feel intimidated by a secretary who refuses to recognise their role as a mere agent of the owners. It is critical however that due process is followed in removing an existing secretary. Boutique is happy to assist, at no cost, to ensure the correct procedures are followed.

Boutique has recently provided financial and legal support to two large downtown Body Corporates who wished to change secretary, but were frustrated by the secretary’s refusal to accept due process. In both instances the owners, with the support of Boutique New Zealand, successfully applied to the High Court, which confirmed the secretary’s role is as servant to the owners.  In both cases substantial costs were awarded against the previous secretary.

Boutique provides guidance at no cost in initiating a change of secretary. In acquiring over 115 Body Corporates in just 4 years, Boutique is experienced in ensuring a seamless and hassle-free change. 

Contact our business development manager, Joanne Barreto, for more information

Email: jo@bbcl.co.nz

This confusion provides a strong incentive for a body corporate to agree to implement the provisions of the new Act, by adopting the adoption measures set out in S220.  If this does not occur, and in the interim period the wrong administrative procedures are adopted...

Read More »

his confusion provides a strong incentive for a body corporate to agree to implement the provisions of the new Act, by adopting the adoption measures set out in S220.

Read More »

Updates on Leaky Building Claims and Litigation

Read More »

More Lssons from the Christchurch Quakes....

Read More »

Owners will be aware that a Bill to amend the WHRS Act 2006 has been submitted in Parliament

Read More »

For Body Corporates, insurance will often be the largest item contained in the Body Corporate budget. Invariably focus will be on the premium, and often little attention is paid to the policy terms and conditions. Boutique has been successful in negotiating a specialist Body Corporate policy through its principal broker, ACM Ahlers, which is not only comprehensive, but also price competitive. The issue of comprehensiveness has been reinforced with those Body Corporates unfortunate to have suffered through the two major quakes Christchurch has experienced.

Read More »

The New Act was passed into law in April 2010. It does not however become operative until the regulations are promulgated. This is expected to occur in late 2010 or early 2011. The Act brings significant changes which will impact on the governance and operation of most Body Corporates. For a summary of some of the significant changes

Read More »

While it is more than 8 years since the problem of leaky buildings became apparent, it still affects many Body Corporates. Critical to successfully addressing the problem is appropriate professional guidance from those who can correctly and accurately identify the various obligations and rights of owners and the Body Corporate. Flowing from that assessment, the necessary decisions relating to repair and potential defect litigation can be examined. Boutique has the expertise to assist you through the various steps. Some of the issues affecting owners

Read More »