Secretary

Do you need one?

Under the Unit Titles Act every Body Corporate must have a secretary. Apart from some smaller Body Corporates, which manage their own secretarial function, this function is usually carried out by a professional secretary. The initial secretary is appointed by the developer of the complex. Whether for performance reasons, costs or personality conflicts, a Body Corporate may look to change its secretary at any time. Sadly a number of secretaries resist such change in a fashion out of proportion to logic and sound business practice – this may include relying on unlawful rules to attempt to retain the Body Corporate or intimidate owners. Boutique is able to assist in effecting change, cost effectively, in the interest of all owners.

How Do You Change?

Owners should not feel intimidated by a secretary who refuses to recognise their role as a mere agent of the owners. It is critical however that due process is followed in removing an existing secretary. Boutique is happy to assist, at no cost, to ensure the correct procedures are followed.

Boutique has recently provided financial and legal support to two large downtown Body Corporates who wished to change secretary, but were frustrated by the secretary’s refusal to accept due process. In both instances the owners, with the support of Boutique New Zealand, successfully applied to the High Court, which confirmed the secretary’s role is as servant to the owners.  In both cases substantial costs were awarded against the previous secretary.

Boutique provides guidance at no cost in initiating a change of secretary. In acquiring over 115 Body Corporates in just 4 years, Boutique is experienced in ensuring a seamless and hassle-free change. 

Contact our business development manager, Joanne Barreto, for more information

Email: jo@bbcl.co.nz

Author: Antony Created: 10/28/2011 1:10 PM
There was an article I read at the week-end by Rod Thomas Senior Law Lecturer AUT Auckland, about the confusion around the Transitional rules in the Latest Property Council newsletter He finished up: “This confusion provides a strong incentive for a body corporate to agree to implement the provisions of the new Act, by adopting the adoption measures set out in S220. If this does not occur, and in the interim period the wrong administrative procedures are adopted, this may result in committee members becoming personally liable for acts such as authorising payments, raising levies, or entering into commercial obligations which are ultimately shown to have been invalid.” This supports our view that the BC should adopt the new Act and run the meeting in terms of the governance provisions if for no other reason than risk minimisation and certainty

This confusion provides a strong incentive for a body corporate to agree to implement the provisions of the new Act, by adopting the adoption measures set out in S220.  If this does not occur, and in the interim period the wrong administrative procedures are adopted...

Read More »